Can anyone tell me the difference with these two model numbers? The specs seem exactly the same. are they perhaps country specific, or is one a more recent model?
Profuse apologies if this is already answered elsewhere, (I'm well short of time to brows extensively at the mo)
Cheers,
robjk
You can only use memory that your motherboard requires. Check the memory requirements for your motherboard.
Doc
Hi people of Intel!
I followed this problem of yours for a years now.
How long are you going to do this? can't you honestly tell people "it just doesn't work" and stop spending users time and energy?
Is there anybody here who managed to get this to work by the help of Intel?
Anybody?
And kevin_intel please, do not delete this post (again)!
I too experience the same 1 second of splash screen. I am running Crucial M500 240Gb plus 2 x 4Gb Crucial ram with Opensuse 13.1 Linux OS. The system really flies have never experienced a full desktop boot so quick before. I fear however all is not as it should be with the bios as many attempts to access boot order have failed and it seems unlikely that I can succeed with the very brief splash screen. Currently on BIOS 27 which applied from new, not attempted an update to 28.
Hi Joe,
I have have been disabling windows firewall, avast and malwarebytes every time I try to connect.
I'm trying on 5ghz but have tried 2.4 also to no avail.
No logs are generated, see my reg attached.
Any suggestions?
Please see the threadRandom wireless keyboard problems with NUC D54250WYKH
This is the same issue I believe. I reckon they will need a redesign to overcome the issue, or at least a screening addition.
OK another update, I have been trying to work out if the heat output of my replacement CPU matches the normal heat output for this model and replicated a bench of the NH-L12 on Tom's Hardware cooling a 4770K overclocked and undervolted and running Prime95 at 4.0GHz. The results show the same deltaT 47°C between CPU and ambient indicating similar heat output because the deltaT would be greater if the CPU was running hotter with the same cooler. This is quite a neat proof as the figures did match exactly so I am satisfifed this CPU is working to spec.
Thanks to all those who contributed.
For those who are having similar problems...
For Intel these facts indicate a quality control issue. Further to this, with a non faulty CPU, using the retail cooler results in thermal throttling under load and the CPUs are not able to operate to spec either in terms of operating temperature or clock frequency under loads like Prime95 v28.5 with third party cooling like the NH-L12.
This suggests to me IMHO that the package thermal interface relies on thermal throttling to prevent CPU damage rather than providing a sufficient pathway for peak heat transfer, by design. As a result the CPU cannot achieve its specified capability in bench tests like Prime95 without third party cooling capacity significantly exceeding the rated thermal output of the CPU.
Well, I'm giving up. I even tried the "nuclear option"--exchanging my NUC for a new one. And you know what... the new one is EVEN LOUDER. Plus its fan was louder too. I also tried swapping for the new power supply, and switching outlets. Nothing helps.
I ran the Windows performance assessment and learned the following: The NUC squeals like a pig when undergoing the graphics tests, and is much quieter during the CPU, memory and hard disk tests. This confirms what I have observed, which is that the noise occurs mostly when the screen is being redrawn in some way (dragging a window, playing a movie). But playing a 1080p file from my GoPro causes much less noise than just a Flash movie on a website (like an ad). And if the noise occurs with Ubuntu as paisley wrote, then it's not a Windows problem.
Maybe Intel should just say that it's a feature. Call it "Intel Audible Video Technology."
No, no luck on my end. Is yours also the "H" model with the 2.5" bay?
My new strategy might be to buy another NUC and return the noisy one!
Edit: Paisley, what RAM and hard drive do you have?
Yes, that power supply will work on the 7.5,9v or 12v settings. Based on the diagram on the supply, It looks like you can adjust the polarity of the barrel jack plug. You will want to make sure that you have the center of the plug set as + (positive).
The one other thing I found that seems to fix all problems on the latest drivers is to uninstall PROSET software. I have no idea why that would work but it has dramatically improved my internet throughput
Sorry, I missed that. I came in late on this one and didn't see it.
When i plug the edison into my PC it mounts as a mass storage device. Where is the image that it mounts located in the edison's file-system.
Thx to the detailed instructions I have PuTTY and WiFi connectivity to the Yocto image. How can I go about doing my development work in "some IDE" in Edison rather than the tethered host which ran the Blink confirmation? I would like to disconnect the umbilical cords to the host and do everything via Edison (after connecting a suitable power supply, of course). How about IDLE support with Yocto? Can I install Edison flavored Arduino IDE (Linux) along the same lines as I did on the host (alas, that was Windows). Rgds.
Hi all,
I saw a document stated that located on the bottom side of the board, this slot allow you to plug any compatible mini PCI express card to use it with your Linux system. Commonly, we like to plug here a WiFi or Bluetooth or GSM adaptor. Hence, it could connect with GSM apart from WiFi card?
Thanks
Amey
Same issue here. However, with BF4 it stays @60p at 1920x1080 but with FIFA15 it switches to 60i and causes flickering at the same resolution.
Any updates coming?
Hi,
Here is what I meant in my last posting about the ADC resolution. I hope someone would point out what I did wrong... Thanks.
Ok sir i will surely try these out in C and i will come back to you with more doubts after i do all these....Thank you ..you helped me lot....
Not sure you are doing anything wrong. As I mentioned in my post, on my Generation 1 and 1.53, using analogReadResolution(12) inside of script gives me the full 12 bit resolution of the A2D. I have tested this out using a variety of sensors and am absolutely convinced that is the case. If you don't set it at 12 bits, you get the default of 10 bits...and, as I wrote in my previous post, setting it to 16 bits does not get you true 16 bit resolution but will pad the 4 lsb bits with 0s.
Change the code to Serial.print(analogRead(Pin), BIN); makes it easy to see this. The screen shot below was taken a few minutes ago after connecting +5 to A0.
Looks like you are getting 10 bit resolution and 0 padding for the unused bits. Could this be a Gen 1 / Gen 2 difference? I don't know, sorry.
@intel_dan - ah, I should have spotted that. The board makes a lot more sense now.